Edgewall Software

Ticket #1083 (closed enhancement: wontfix)

Opened 4 years ago

Last modified 2 years ago

Priorities should not be settable with new tickets

Reported by: stephen@… Owned by: jonas
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: ticket system Version: 0.8
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Is there a reason that the end user is able to set the priority on tickets? Having a priority distinct from Severity is useful for developers, but the end user shouldn't need to know (or be able to set) what priority a developer has over bugfixes, should they?

It's my opinion that having both present only serves to confuse end users, and should probably be left off...

Attachments

Change History

Changed 4 years ago by Manuzhai

What, don't your developers ever open a ticket themselves?

Changed 4 years ago by anonymous

I also disgress. In our setup, the reporter from another department can indicate, how important the fix for the bug / the enhancement asked for etc. is for him.

Changed 4 years ago by jordi@…

Yep. I've always seen Trac as an internal tool. I don't like the idea of showing the Wiki, timeline, or source code browser to customers.

Around here at least customers don't use bug trackers. They call, or send emails to the helpdesk/person in charge. We input things in.

Changed 4 years ago by anonymous

End users should be able to have a way to input a ticket and gain information about it's progress. However, the email tool is probably the best way to do this.

Changed 4 years ago by mgood

  • status changed from new to closed
  • resolution set to wontfix

I think the above comments provide enough reasons to leave the priority available when creating tickets.

Add/Change #1083 (Priorities should not be settable with new tickets)

Author



Change Properties
<Author field>
Action
as closed
Next status will be 'reopened'
to The owner will change from jonas. Next status will be 'closed'
 
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.